INTRAARTERIAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS CISPLATINUM (IN ADDITION TO SYSTEMICADRIAMYCIN AND HIGH-DOSE METHOTREXATE) IN THE NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT OF OSTEOSARCOMA OF THE EXTREMITIES - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED STUDY
G. Bacci et al., INTRAARTERIAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS CISPLATINUM (IN ADDITION TO SYSTEMICADRIAMYCIN AND HIGH-DOSE METHOTREXATE) IN THE NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT OF OSTEOSARCOMA OF THE EXTREMITIES - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED STUDY, Journal of chemotherapy, 8(1), 1996, pp. 70-81
Intra-arterial (IA) and intravenous (IV) cisplatinum (CDP) were studie
d in a multiagent regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma
of the extremities. Preoperatively two cycles of high-dose methotrexa
te (HDMTX) were administered, followed 5 days later by CDP and Adriamy
cin (ADM). MTX and ADM were administered IV, and CDP was delivered IA
or IV. Postoperatively, good responders received 3 more cycles of the
same drugs, while poor responders had a longer chemotherapy including
ifosfamide. The rate of good histological response to chemotherapy was
significantly higher in patients treated intraarterially (78% vs 46%:
P < .004), while no significant differences in terms of disease-free
survival were observed between patients who received CDP IA and patien
ts who received CDP IV (55% vs 51%). In the IA group, however, there w
as only one local recurrence vs 5 in the TV group. The IA infusion of
CDP is more active on the primary tumor than the IV infusion.