Tj. Vogl et al., SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE-ENHANCED VERSUS GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING FOR DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS OF FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS, Radiology, 198(3), 1996, pp. 881-887
PURPOSE: To assess AMI-25-versus gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonanc
e (MR) imaging in the differential diagnosis of liver tumors. MATERIAL
S AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with liver tumors underwent unenha
nced, AMI-25-enhanced (15 mu mol/kg), and gadolinium-enhanced(0.1 mmol
/kg) imaging within 2 weeks. RESULTS: A significant (P <.05) differenc
e in percentage signal intensity loss (PSIL) was seen in benign tumors
on AMI-25-enhanced proton-density-weighted images (nine focal nodular
hyperplasia [FNH], 41%; one adenoma, 32.4%) versus malignant tumors.
Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo images showed strong enh
ancement in benign lesions (seven FNH, 147.5%; one adenoma, 91.3%) and
moderate enhancement in malignant tumors (eight hepatoeellular carcin
omas, 116.2%; 11 metastases, 39.7%). Receiver operating characteristic
analysis revealed a threshold PSIL of 10% on AMI-25-enhanced images a
s the most essential criteria to distinguish benign from malignant les
ions (sensitivity, 88%; specificity. 89%). Interobserver analysis for
two observers revealed specificity of 93% for AMI-25-enhanced imaging
versus 81.5% for gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. CONCLUSION: AMI-25 de
creased the SI of benign tumors and helped differentiate benign from m
alignant tumors.