Study objective: To quantify use by geriatric patients of emergency me
dical services (EMS) compared with that by young adult patients. Metho
ds: We conducted a retrospective, consecutive case series over a 6-mon
th period in a suburban, all-paramedic municipal EMS system serving 76
,500 residents, of whom approximately 15% are 65 years of age or older
and 33% are between 25 and 45 years old. Patient age, the sole entry
criterion, was used to distinguish two groups: the young adult group,
defined as patients 25 to 45 years old; and the geriatric group, defin
ed as patients 65 years or older. Results: Of the 2,712 patients whose
cases were reviewed during the study period, 1,734 (64%) met the entr
y criterion. The geriatric group (n=1,043) accounted for 39% of the to
tal call volume, compared with the young adult group (n=690), which ac
counted for 25% of total call volume. Patients in the young adult grou
p were 7.3 times more likely to have been in a motor vehicle accident,
whereas the GP group was 2.6 times more likely to have cardiorespirat
ory complaints, 1.8 times more likely to have fallen, and 1.7 times mo
re likely to have minor medical problems requiring transportation and
more frequently required advanced life support (ALS) care (54% versus
33%) (P<.001 for all comparisons). Scene times for geriatric patients
were found to be longer than those for young adults (ALS, P<.001; basi
c life support [BLS], P<.05). However, costs billed to the patient wer
e greater for young adults for all care rendered (BLS, P<.001; ALS, P<
.05). Conclusion: Use by geriatric patients of EMS differed significan
tly from that by young adults. Geriatric patients used EMS more freque
ntly and required more ALS care than did young adults. Although geriat
ric patients required longer scene times for EMS care, young adults in
curred greater charges for service. These findings, although perhaps s
ystem specific, speak to the need for ongoing analysis of EMS health c
are delivery to better serve a population increasing in age.