Jr. Markham et al., FT-IR MEASUREMENTS OF EMISSIVITY AND TEMPERATURE DURING HIGH-FLUX SOLAR PROCESSING, Journal of solar energy engineering, 118(1), 1996, pp. 20-29
The experimental capability to generate and utilize concentrated solar
flux has been demonstrated at a number of facilities in the United St
ates. To advance this research area the National Renewable Energy Labo
ratory (NREL) has designed and constructed a versatile High Flux Solar
Furnace (HFSF). Research is ongoing in areas of material processing,
high temperature and UV enhanced detoxification, chemical synthesis, h
igh flux optics, solar pumped lasers, and high heating rate processes.
Surface modifications via concentrated solar flux, however are curren
tly performed without the means to accurately monitor the temperature
of the surface of interest Thermoelectric and pyrometric devices are n
ot accurate due to limitations in surface contact and knowledge of sur
face emissivity, respectively, as well as interference contributed by
the solar flux. in this article, we present a noncontact optical techn
ique that simultaneously measures the directional spectral emissivity,
and temperature of the surface during solar processing. A Fourier Tra
nsform Infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer is coupled to a processing chambe
r at NREL's HFSF with a fiber-optic radiation transfer assembly. The s
ystem measures directional emission and hemispherical-directional refl
ectance in a spectral region that lacks contribution from solar flux.
From these radiative property measurements during solar processing, th
e spectral emittance and temperature at the measurement point can be o
btained. The methodology, validation measurements, and in-situ measure
ments during solar processing of materials are presented. Knowledge of
surface temperature during solar processing is an important parameter
for process control. Based on validation measurements for spectral em
ittance, the temperature error associated with the novel instrument is
less than +/-5 percent for surfaces of mid-range emittance. The error
decreases for surfaces of higher emittance. This is far better than o
ptical methods which are ''lost'' in terms of knowing the appropriate
emittance for conversion of measured radiant intensity to temperature.