REVISION TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY - DOES MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT JUSTIFY TIME SPENT

Citation
Ma. Ritter et al., REVISION TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY - DOES MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT JUSTIFY TIME SPENT, Orthopedics, 19(2), 1996, pp. 137-139
Citations number
3
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics
Journal title
ISSN journal
01477447
Volume
19
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
137 - 139
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-7447(1996)19:2<137:RTJA-D>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
In 1991, five different total joint replacement surgeons performed 337 primary total knee replacements and 250 primary total hip replacement s. They revised 25 total knee replacements and 73 total hip replacemen ts. The average length of stay was 6.6 days for the primary total knee arthroplasty and 7.5 days for knee revisions. For total hip replaceme nt, average stay was 5.9 days for primary surgery and 6 days for revis ions. The operative time required for each of the five surgeons to com plete a total knee replacement increased 55%, 3%, 38%, 72% and 38%; wh ereas for the total hip replacement, time increased 87%, 77%, 84% and 58%. Overall, there was a 41% increase in operating time for revision total knee replacements and a 77% increase for revision total hip repl acement. Allowable charges by Medicare in 1993 for a primary knee and hip replacement were $1,298 and $1,363, respectively. Revision total k nee replacement increased 24.3% ($1,613) and revision total hip replac ement increased 30.8% ($1,782) in the state of Indiana. These figures do not encourage those surgeons who are capable of doing total joint r eplacements to revise other surgeons' problems.