Background: Traditionally, colour information is assumed to be carried
by neural channels in the parvocellular pathway and to be encoded in
an opponent manner, while other, non-parvocellular, spectrally non-opp
onent channels are thought to play no part in colour vision. But is th
e parvocellular pathway the only way that colours can be discriminated
in human vision? We studied two patients with cerebral achromatopsia,
who lack conscious colour perception but are nevertheless able to mak
e use of colour information. In particular, we investigated whether, i
n these patients, colour discrimination is mediated by the parvocellul
ar pathway. Results: The achromatopsic patients carried out a forced-c
hoice colour- and luminance-discrimination task, and showed clear evid
ence of unconscious colour processing, consistent with previous studie
s. We added different types of luminance noise to see when this uncons
cious colour information could be masked. The results of the colour-di
scrimination-with-noise and the brightness-non-additivity experiments
showed a double-dissociation between patients. This indicates that, in
one patient, unconscious colour discrimination may be subserved by a
spectrally non-opponent mechanism, which does not have the characteris
tics of the parvocellular pathway and which is responsive to fast flic
ker. Spectral sensitivity, contrast sensitivity and motion perception
experiments confirmed that this patient lacks a working opponent parvo
cellular system. The second achromatopsic patient showed evidence of a
residual parvocellular system. Conclusions: Our results show that chr
omatic discrimination need not be mediated by neural mechanisms, the p
arvocellular system in particular, normally assumed to subserve consci
ous colour perception. Such discrimination may be mediated by a neural
subsystem which responds to fast flicker, is spectrally non-opponent,
and supports normal motion perception.