This paper examines how, in the presence of individual risk, economic
efficiency can be achieved without an unrealistically large number of
contingent claims. Market uncertainty is specified in such a way that
general types of individual risk and collective risk are properly acco
unted for and so that, specifically, market clearing is always satisfi
ed ex post as well as ex ante. We show that consistency of beliefs and
optimality of allocation can be guaranteed with an appropriate array
of pure Arrow securities to spread collective risk and mutual insuranc
e policies to pool individual risk. When there is individual risk comm
on to like groups of individuals, pooling risk by means of mutual insu
rance permits substantial economizing on market transactions, as compa
red to those required if dealing instead with the full complement of p
ure Arrow securities. We show that if there are N households (consisti
ng of H types), each facing the possibility of being in S individual s
tates together with T collective states, then ensuring Pareto optimali
ty requires only H(S - 1)T independent mutual insurance policies plus
T pure Arrow securities. Our results also help to clarify the question
of which missing markets may affect allocational efficiency.