Pg. Miles et al., CRANIOFACIAL STRUCTURE AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA SYNDROME - A QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS AND METAANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 109(2), 1996, pp. 163-172
The etiologic relevance of craniofacial structure to obstructive sleep
apnea syndrome (OSAS) is controversial yet the premise of a causal as
sociation serves to justify many treatments. A qualitative and quantit
ative analysis of the literature was performed to examine the foundati
on for any relationship between craniofacial structure and OSAS. A MED
LINE search and investigation of the published and unpublished literat
ure on diagnostic imaging and OSAS was toxonomically arranged. Each sa
mple study was evaluated by using the following criteria: (a) appropri
ate control group, (b) ''blinding'' of evaluators, (c) reliability mea
sured, (d) random assignment of treatment, and (e) ''success'' was def
ined adequately in efficacy studies. Morphologic variables were combin
ed among studies and compared with controls drawn from either the same
patient pool as the OSAS group, or matched for gender, age, and body
mass index. Analysis revealed 32 review articles, 16 case reports, and
95 sample studies. Only seven sample studies drew a control group fro
m the same patient pool, whereas five used matched controls. Only one
of these studies satisfied all the qualitative criteria. Of the treatm
ent efficacy studies, 10 defined outcome adequately. However, none of
these met all the qualitative criteria. The most consistent, strong ef
fect sizes with the highest potential diagnostic accuracies were for m
andibular plane to hyoid, mandibular plane angle, and mandibular body
length. Only mandibular body length demonstrated a clinically signific
ant association with and diagnostic accuracy for OSAS. However, since
this variable's controls were selected from the literature, possible e
xplanations for a positive association include methodologic difference
s between studies, varying magnification factors, and morphologic diff
erences.