INTRANASAL FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE VERSUS LORATADINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENT PATIENTS WITH SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS

Citation
G. Jordana et al., INTRANASAL FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE VERSUS LORATADINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENT PATIENTS WITH SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 97(2), 1996, pp. 588-595
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,Allergy
ISSN journal
00916749
Volume
97
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
588 - 595
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-6749(1996)97:2<588:IFPVLI>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a topical corticosteroid with minimal s ystemic activity. We examined safety and compared the efficacy of FP a queous nasal spray 200 mu g every day with loratadine tablets, 10 mg b y mouth every day in 240 adolescents with ragweed pollen-induced seaso nal allergic rhinitis for 4 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, paral lel-group study. Nasal and eye symptoms were recorded daily on a 4-poi nt (0 to 3) scale. A higher percentage of symptom-free days was observ ed for nasal blockage on waking during treatment with FP (p < 0.0001). Significant results were also obtained for all other nasal symptoms w hen analyzed for both symptom-free days and symptom scores. No differe nces were found for eye irritation symptoms (p = 0.14). Morning and ev ening nasal peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was recorded daily by 57 subje cts. FP treatment was associated with significantly higher PIF values than loratadine both morning (p = 0.0051) and evening (p = 0.0036). A greater improvement over 4 weeks was observed for PIF morning values i n the FP group (p = 0.008) but not for evening values (p = 0.358). Sta tistically significant correlations were found for nasal blockage and PIF in the morning (r = -0.54, p = 0.0001) and in the evening (r = -0. 46, p = 0.008).