Re. Dickson et al., WHEN HEARINGS NOT BELIEVING - PERCEIVED DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EXPLANATIONS FOR 2 COMPLIANCE FAILURES, Journal of language and social psychology, 15(1), 1996, pp. 27-39
This article compares respondents' beliefs about others' private and p
ublic explanations for failure to fulfill true compliance-gaining goal
s: providing assistance and accepting advice. Participants generated o
pen-ended responses that were either acceptable accounts (public expla
nations) or probable causes (private attributions) for another's nonco
mpliance. Data analysis showed that attributions and accounts tend to
vary in form, and, as expected, public explanations perceived as likel
y to be communicated were more unintentional, uncontrollable, unstable
, and external than were private explanations for both failure types.
People's reports for both attributions and accounts, however, were inf
luenced by the nature of the compliance goal, with means for scenarios
depicting failures to take advice consistently more intentional and c
ontrollable than the responses for failing to provide assistance.