Despite their apparent gender-neutrality, most discussions of poverty
have been premised on the concept of a male actor and of male-centred
notions of well-being and agency. The assumption underpinning income/c
onsumption and well-being measures is that shortfalls in income/consum
ption translate into shortfalls in choice, and are manifested in short
-falls in well-being. However, gender introduces disjunctures into thi
s process, with the result that these measures inadequately capture wo
men's experience of poverty. The basic conundrum that plagues attempts
to conceptualize the gender dimensions of poverty stems from the oper
ation of the forces that create scarcity, on the one hand, and discrim
ination, on the other. The form in which women's poverty manifests its
elf depends on the cultural context far more than it does for men, sug
gesting that it cannot be understood through the same conceptual lens.