W. Weiss et al., LEED STRUCTURE DETERMINATION OF THE (100)-SURFACE OF A COSI2 CRYSTAL AND A COSI2 FILM GROWN EPITAXIALLY ON SI(100), Surface science, 347(1-2), 1996, pp. 117-127
The surface structures of CoSi2(100) for a bulk crystal and a 12 Angst
rom thin film grown epitaxially on Si(100) are compared by means of qu
antitative low energy electron diffraction (LEED). Similar LEED patter
ns are observed for both systems corresponding to a c(2 x 2) periodici
ty with respect to the Si(100) surface. Also, intensity versus energy
curves are very similar for the film and bulk samples. Consequently, w
e derive practically the same best-fit model when fitting the experime
ntal data with spectra obtained from full dynamical LEED calculations:
the CoSi2 surface is arranged in CaF2 structure, terminated by one fu
ll Si layer with an additional c(2 x 2) Si overlayer of half monolayer
coverage. The top silicon adatoms reside in four-fold symmetric hollo
w sites. The unfavourable energetics of this rather peculiar bonding g
eometry are obviously overcompensated by the energy gain from the satu
ration of dangling bonds on the surface. The geometry found is consist
ent with the chemical passivity of the surface.