The hypothesis that strong differential rotation coupled with the pref
erential appearance of higher latitude hot spots on classical T Tauri
stars (CTTS) and low latitude cool spots on naked T Tauri stars (NTTS)
can account for the apparent difference in the rotation periods of th
e two groups of stars is tested. It is shown that the required level o
f differential rotation produces measurable changes in the profile sha
pes of the photospheric absorption lines. High spectral resolution obs
ervations of 1 NTTS (HDE 283572 - vsini approximate to 110 km s(-1)) a
nd 2 CTTS (SU Aur - vsini approximate to 66 km s(-1); RY Tau - vsini a
pproximate to 50 km s(-1)) are analyzed for the presence of differenti
al rotation. It is shown that these stars are consistent with solid-bo
dy rotation and rule out the strong differential rotation required to
explain the rotation period difference between CTTS and NTTS. This fur
ther supports the hypothesis that CTTS do in fact rotate slower than N
TTS due to the interaction of stellar magnetic fields with the accreti
on disks which surround CTTS. In addition, a more accurate measure of
vsini approximate to 80 km s(-1) for HDE 283572 is given.