Td. Papiernik et al., EFFECT OF VARIOUS MATERIALS IN MULTILEVEL SAMPLERS ON MONITORING COMMONLY OCCURRING AGRICHEMICALS IN-GROUND WATER, Ground water monitoring & remediation, 16(1), 1996, pp. 80-84
Studies have shown that materials, such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PT
FE), rigid polyvinyl chloride (rigid PVC), flexible polyvinyl chloride
(flexible PVC), stainless steel (SS), low-density polyethylene (LDPE)
, and high-density polyethylene (HDPE), have the potential to influenc
e certain analyte concentrations in ground water samples. The effects
of HDPE, LDPE, PTFE, rigid PVC, and SS on aqueous concentrations of ni
trate-N, atrazine, deethylatrazine (DEA), and deisopropylatrazine (DIA
) were evaluated in a field study. A laboratory study was conducted to
evaluate sorption of atrazine, DEA, DIA, cyanazine, alachlor, metolac
hlor. and butachlor to PTFE, HDPE, and SS materials. Butachlor is rare
ly used in the United States, but was included because of its expected
high sorptivity. No significant differences between HDPE, LDPE PTFE,
rigid PVC, and SS were determined for any of the analytes tested in th
e field study. In the laboratory study, sorption of DIA to PTFE and SS
was significant at 2.6 x 10(-5) and 4.1 x 10(-5) mu g/m(2), respectiv
ely. Sorption of DIA to HDPE was not significantly > 0; sorption of al
l other compounds to HDPE, PTFE, and SS were also not significantly >
0. Results of the two studies indicate that for these analytes (relati
vely polar or ionized compounds), representative ground water samples
are not dependent on the materials used for multilevel sampler constru
ction. When considering these compounds, it appears that the least exp
ensive materials (HDPE, rigid PVC, and LDPE) are good choices for the
construction of ground water monitoring wells.