Ian Barbour is wisely aware of two kinds of ethical problems that cons
tantly interact: first, those where we know the good but lack the will
to do it; second, those where, in uncertainties and conflicts of valu
es, we have to discover the best course of action. Both have long hist
ories; but new technologies, which mean new powers, accentuate both. T
hree issues in Barbour's work deserve comment here: (1) the ways in wh
ich technology requires new ethical thinking, but cannot of itself mak
e ethical prescriptions; (2) the perplexing relation of technology to
political processes; (3) the relation between need and greed, a valid
distinction that may be more puzzling than Barbour allows because a te
chnological culture multiplies needs. I applaud Barbour's achievement.
I find it ironic that I occasionally think him a shade too optimistic
, whereas he has occasionally said the same of me.