A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE RELATIVE UTILITY OF ELECTROPHORESIS, IMMUNOELECTROPHORESIS, IMMUNOFIXATION, AND NEPHELOMETRY IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SERUM-PROTEINS
Ml. Salkie, A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE RELATIVE UTILITY OF ELECTROPHORESIS, IMMUNOELECTROPHORESIS, IMMUNOFIXATION, AND NEPHELOMETRY IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SERUM-PROTEINS, Clinical biochemistry, 29(1), 1996, pp. 39-42
Objectives: To assess the relative value of visual inspection of prote
in electrophoresis patterns, immunoelectrophoresis, immunofixation, an
d specific protein quantitation in the investigation of serum proteins
. Design and Methods: A retrospective study of protein results on 372
sera analyzed by electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis. A subsecti
on of specimens (276) also had immunoglobulin quantitation by immunone
phelometry and 30 were studied by immunofixation. Results: Total gamma
globulin levels were correctly assessed visually in 84.4% of cases. D
iscrete bands seen visually were mainly monoclonal in 74 of 80 (92.5%)
. Six monoclonal proteins were not detected visually. Twenty-five mono
clonal proteins required immunofixation for typing, and 60 were typed
by immunoelectrophoresis. The visual assessment of the level of normal
immunoglobulins in the presence of a monoclonal gammopathy was correc
t in 58% of cases. Conclusions: The majority of monoclonal gammopathie
s could be evaluated by a combination of protein electrophoresis and i
mmunoelectrophoresis. Except for quantitating monoclonal immunoglobins
, protein electrophoresis was unreliable as a quantitative procedure a
nd nephelometry was preferred.