T2-WEIGHTED SPIN-ECHO MR-IMAGING OF THE LIVER - BREATH-HOLD FAST SPIN-ECHO VERSUS NON-BREATH-HOLD FAST SPIN-ECHO IMAGES WITH AND WITHOUT FAT-SUPPRESSION
P. Soyer et al., T2-WEIGHTED SPIN-ECHO MR-IMAGING OF THE LIVER - BREATH-HOLD FAST SPIN-ECHO VERSUS NON-BREATH-HOLD FAST SPIN-ECHO IMAGES WITH AND WITHOUT FAT-SUPPRESSION, American journal of roentgenology, 166(3), 1996, pp. 593-597
OBJECTIVE. The goal of our study was to compare a TP-weighted breath-h
old fast spin-echo (BHSE) technique with TS-weighted non-breath-hold f
ast spin-echo techniques for imaging the liver. SUBJECTS AND METHODS.
Thirty-three patients with hepatic lesions had T2-weighted BHSE images
obtained in 22 sec and conventional T2-weighted non-breath-hold fast
spin-echo images obtained in 3 min 12 sec with and without fat suppres
sion. Images were analyzed quantitatively by measuring the lesion-live
r contrast, spleen-liver contrast, and signal-to-noise ratios of lesio
ns and qualitatively by evaluating the sharpness of hepatic contours,
visibility of intrahepatic vessels and other segmental landmarks, and
presence of artifacts. RESULTS. Quantitatively, lesion-liver contrast,
spleen-liver contrast, and signal-to-noise ratios obtained with the B
HSE technique were inferior to those obtained with fast spin-echo tech
niques with and without fat suppression (11.2 +/- 7.1 versus 15.4 +/-
10.6 and 14.5 +/- 9.8, p < .001; 5.3 +/- 3.7 versus 8.7 +/- 3.5 and 7.
0 +/- 3.8, p < .001; 16.2 +/- 8.2 versus 20.1 +/- 10.9 and 19.7 +/- 9.
5, p < .01, respectively; Student's t test). Qualitatively, image arti
facts and intrahepatic vessel depiction on BHSE images were similar to
those obtained with the fast spin-echo techniques. The BHSE technique
was superior to fat-suppressed fast spin-echo technique for showing h
epatic contours (p < .01; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION. The
BHSE technique is quantitatively inferior to non-breath-hold fast spin
-echo techniques. However, further studies with a surgical standard of
reference are needed to compare the three techniques in terms of sens
itivity.