The author argues that despite the recent intellectual opening charact
erized by the institution of cultural and postcolonial studies, certai
n parts of the world (such as the Middle East, Eastern Europe) and soc
ial movements (such as politico-religious and ethnic) continue to occu
py the paradigmatic status of backward cultural Others in the ruminati
ons of writers from the left and right of the political spectrum. Taki
ng S. Hall's essay 'Culture, community, nation' that appeared in the O
ctober 1993 issue of Cultural Studies as a template, the author shows
how arguments made with a progressive political agenda sometimes conve
rge argumentatively and epistemologically with those of the conservati
ve right in their failure to decenter normative assumptions derived fr
om the entelechy of Western European history about ethnic and religiou
s aspirations. Illiberal results of profoundly liberal ideologies, suc
h as nationalism, continue to be explained through culturally particul
aristic arguments so as to avoid critiquing the fundamentals of Wester
n European liberal-humanist projects. Symptomatic analyses that explai
n the success of ethnic and politico-religious movements as signs of s
ocio-cultural disorder, cultural backwardness and/or lack of appropria
te modernization fail to take these movements seriously: that must be
dealt with through argumentation. Both the critics and champions of mo
dernity take the West as their point of departure, and political langu
ages that depart from the recommended repertoire of public expression
are often dismissed. The author calls for a historically specific and
culturally nuanced analysis of movements that are often considered to
be the antithesis of modernity in order to both parochialize the Weste
rn experience of modernity, and to understand the significance of thes
e movements to the present historical moment.