This article is a short response to Chen's critique of our article 'As
ianing Australia: notes toward a critical transnationalism in cultural
studies'. It is argued that Chen's attack on our article is misdirect
ed. Furthermore, we are in substantial agreement with Chen on many iss
ues, most importantly that the nation-state should not be the uninterr
ogated site for the development of a 'local' cultural studies. However
, we find Chen's politics, and his use of a reductionist Marxist theor
y, overly simplistic. Moreover, the core/periphery binary which he use
s is not adequate to express the complexities of a global capitalist w
orld order in which the sites of power are becoming increasingly decen
tred. Similarly, the politics of resistance are also more complex than
Chen suggests; resistance must be understood in relation to local sit
uations and local tactics, as well as the imperatives of global capita
lism. Finally, a properly localized and left-politicized cultural stud
ies must reflexively interrogate the politics of theory, including Mar
xism, considering its specific 'western' history and recognizing the n
ecessary partiality of theory in a postcolonial world of differentiate
d modernities.