COMPARISON OF GRANISETRON, ONDANSETRON, AND TROPISETRON IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF ACUTE NAUSEA AND VOMITING INDUCED BY CISPLATIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEAD AND NECK-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
G. Mantovani et al., COMPARISON OF GRANISETRON, ONDANSETRON, AND TROPISETRON IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF ACUTE NAUSEA AND VOMITING INDUCED BY CISPLATIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEAD AND NECK-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL, Cancer, 77(5), 1996, pp. 941-948
BACKGROUND. A single-institution, prospective, randomized, open contro
lled trial was carried out on head and neck cancer patients to compare
granisetron (GRA), ondansetron (OND), and tropisetron (TRO) in the pr
evention of cisplatin-induced acute nausea and vomiting. All patients
were chemotherapy-naive and treated with cisplatin on Day 1 (80 to 100
mg/m(2)). METHODS. One hundred seventeen patients were treated for a
total of 463 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and randomized to
receive 24 mg of OND intravenously (i.v.), 3 mg of GRA i.v., or 5 mg o
f TRO i.v. for the control of acute nausea and emesis. RESULTS. In the
GRA group, complete response (CR) was obtained in 119 of 165 cycles (
72.1%), major response (MR) in 32 cycles (19.4%), minor response (MiR)
in 5 cycles (3%), and a failure (F) in 9 cycles (5.5%). In the OND gr
oup, CR was obtained in 110 of 150 cycles (73.3%), MR in 31 cycles (20
.7%), MiR in 2 cycles (1.3%), and F in 7 cycles (4.7%). In the TRO gro
up, CR was obtained in 100 of 148 cycles (67.6%), MR in 26 cycles (17.
6%), MiR in 15 cycles (10.1%), and F in 7 cycles (4.7%). Major efficac
y (CR + MR) was obtained in 151 of 165 cycles (91.5%) for GRA, in 141
of 150 cycles (94.0%) for OND, and in 126 of 148 cycles (85.2%) for TR
O. The difference in major efficacy between OND and TRO was statistica
lly significant. When comparing MiR, both GRA and OND were more effect
ive than TRO. No other significant differences were observed among the
three antiemetic agents. CONCLUSIONS. Although our results were achie
ved in an open trial, they show that GRA and OND are equally effective
antiemetic agents in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute nausea
and vomiting. TRO provides almost the same protection but is not as e
ffective as OND for major efficacy. All three antiemetics can be admin
istered safely to patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin at d
oses of 80 mg/m(2) or more. (C) 1996 American Cancer Society.