LIMITATIONS OF THE MINIMUM PERIPHERAL DOSE AS A PARAMETER FOR DOSE SPECIFICATION IN PERMANENT I-125 PROSTATE IMPLANTS

Citation
Y. Yu et al., LIMITATIONS OF THE MINIMUM PERIPHERAL DOSE AS A PARAMETER FOR DOSE SPECIFICATION IN PERMANENT I-125 PROSTATE IMPLANTS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 34(3), 1996, pp. 717-725
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
34
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
717 - 725
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1996)34:3<717:LOTMPD>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this work is to investigate whether the mini mum peripheral dose is a practical parameter for dose specification in permanent I-125 implants of the prostate. Methods and Materials: The investigation was carried out by use of a computer model of ellipsoida l I-125 implants in which the average dimension and elongation factor were varied to provide a wide range of geometries, Both ideal and noni deal implants were investigated. The I-125 seeds were confined to the target volume except for a portion of the study in which the effect of placing seeds outside the target volume was investigated. Results: Th e minimum peripheral dose was found to be very sensitive to the seed p lacement, The irregularities in the seed spacing that inevitably occur in actual implants tend to lower the minimum peripheral dose, As a re sult, the minimum peripheral dose is generally significantly less than planned by an amount that is unpredictable, and often exceeds 25%, Ho wever, the percentage of the target volume that receives a dose less t han the prescribed minimum peripheral dose is generally less than 10%, Implanting seeds outside the target volume improves the dose uniformi ty, but does not appear to offer any advantage in dose coverage, and i ncreases the volume of normal tissue irradiated. Conclusion: If a mini mum peripheral dose is prescribed for a permanent I-125 prostate impla nt, and the implant is planned using an idealized implant having preci sely spaced seeds, the prescribed dose will rarely, if ever, be achiev ed, Reasonable agreement with the prescribed dose can be achieved only if the requirement for coverage is relaxed from 100 to 90%, or if the total source strength is increased by 20% to compensate for the antic ipated imperfections in seed placement.