President Clinton and several Legislators have proposed restrictions o
n price increases in the pharmaceutical industry similar to those on s
ome public utilities. Studies, however, suggest that under conditions
of rapidly changing demand (as found in pharmaceuticals), price-caps c
ould be manipulated. Using simulations, we show that in reaction to re
gulation, pharmaceutical firms would optimally set launch prices 50 pe
rcent higher than in an unregulated market. Although initially hurt, a
fter seven years consumers benefit as the unregulated price rises abov
e the price-cap. Thus, before enacting legislation, Congress should as
sess America's willingness to pay more now for lower prices in the fut
ure.