Jam. Johnson et al., THE EARLY AMNIOCENTESIS STUDY - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF EARLY AMNIOCENTESIS VERSUS MIDTRIMESTER AMNIOCENTESIS, Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 11(2), 1996, pp. 85-93
Objectives: The primary purpose of this pilot study was to determine w
hether the safety of early amniocentesis (EA; ii weeks to 12 weeks and
6 days) is similar to midtrimester amniocentesis (MA; 15 weeks to 16
weeks and 6 days). The secondary objectives were to determine the cyto
genetic success and accuracy of EA compared with MA. Methods: This pro
spective, randomized clinical trial compared continuous ultrasound-gui
ded EA and MA (22-gauge needle) in patients at a late maternal age (gr
eater than or equal to 35 years). The procedures were compared for saf
ety, success and accuracy, Results: Among the 683 women randomized and
followed to pregnancy completion, there was a total of 27/344 (7.8%)
and 25/339 (7.4%) fetal losses (spontaneous and induced abortions) in
the EA and MA groups, respectively (difference 0.4%; CI -3.6 to 4.4%).
The rate of postprocedure spontaneous fetal loss was 2.4% (8/330) in
the EA group and 3.3% (10/299) in the MA group (NS), The procedure suc
cess rate at the first attempt was 97.6% in the EA group and 99.7% in
the MA group, There were no diagnostic errors, and all but 2 EA cultur
es were successful (both repeated successfully), The perinatal outcome
was similar in both groups. Conclusions: EA appears to be as safe and
accurate as MA, A large multicentered, randomized trial is currently
underway to verify these results.