Jv. Selby et al., EFFECT OF A COPAYMENT ON USE OF THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN A HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION, The New England journal of medicine, 334(10), 1996, pp. 635-641
Background. Use of the emergency department for nonemergency care is f
requent and costly. We studied the effect of a copayment on emergency
department use in a group-model health maintenance organization (HMO).
Methods. We examined the use of the emergency department in 1992 and
1993 by 30,276 subjects who ranged in age from 1 to 63 years at the st
art of the study and belonged to the Kaiser Permanente HMO in northern
California. We assessed their use of various HMO services and their c
linical outcomes before and after the introduction of a copayment of $
25 to $35 for using the emergency department. This copayment group was
compared with two randomly selected control groups not affected by th
e copayment. One control group, with 60,408 members, was matched for a
ge, sex, and area of residence to the copayment group. The second, wit
h 37,539 members, was matched for these factors and also for the type
of employer. Results. After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic sta
tus, and use of the emergency department in 1992, the decline in the n
umber of visits in 1993 was 14.6 percentage points greater in the copa
yment group than in either control group (P<0.001 for each comparison)
. Visits for urgent care did not increase among subjects in any stratu
m defined by age and sex, and neither did the number of outpatient vis
its by adults and children. The decline in emergency visits for presen
ting conditions classified as ''always an emergency'' was small and no
t significant. For conditions classified as ''often an emergency,'' ''
sometimes not an emergency,'' or ''often not an emergency,'' the decli
nes in the use of the emergency department were larger and statistical
ly significant, and they increased with decreasing severity of the pre
senting condition, Although our ability to detect any adverse effects
of the copayment was limited, there was no suggestion of excess advers
e events in the copayment group, such as increases in mortality or in
the number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations. Conclusions, Amo
ng members of an HMO, the introduction of a small copayment for the us
e of the emergency department was associated with a decline of about 1
5 percent in the use of that department, mostly among patients with co
nditions considered likely not to present an emergency. (C)1996, Massa
chusetts Medical Society.