EFFECT OF A COPAYMENT ON USE OF THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN A HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION

Citation
Jv. Selby et al., EFFECT OF A COPAYMENT ON USE OF THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN A HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION, The New England journal of medicine, 334(10), 1996, pp. 635-641
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00284793
Volume
334
Issue
10
Year of publication
1996
Pages
635 - 641
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-4793(1996)334:10<635:EOACOU>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Background. Use of the emergency department for nonemergency care is f requent and costly. We studied the effect of a copayment on emergency department use in a group-model health maintenance organization (HMO). Methods. We examined the use of the emergency department in 1992 and 1993 by 30,276 subjects who ranged in age from 1 to 63 years at the st art of the study and belonged to the Kaiser Permanente HMO in northern California. We assessed their use of various HMO services and their c linical outcomes before and after the introduction of a copayment of $ 25 to $35 for using the emergency department. This copayment group was compared with two randomly selected control groups not affected by th e copayment. One control group, with 60,408 members, was matched for a ge, sex, and area of residence to the copayment group. The second, wit h 37,539 members, was matched for these factors and also for the type of employer. Results. After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic sta tus, and use of the emergency department in 1992, the decline in the n umber of visits in 1993 was 14.6 percentage points greater in the copa yment group than in either control group (P<0.001 for each comparison) . Visits for urgent care did not increase among subjects in any stratu m defined by age and sex, and neither did the number of outpatient vis its by adults and children. The decline in emergency visits for presen ting conditions classified as ''always an emergency'' was small and no t significant. For conditions classified as ''often an emergency,'' '' sometimes not an emergency,'' or ''often not an emergency,'' the decli nes in the use of the emergency department were larger and statistical ly significant, and they increased with decreasing severity of the pre senting condition, Although our ability to detect any adverse effects of the copayment was limited, there was no suggestion of excess advers e events in the copayment group, such as increases in mortality or in the number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations. Conclusions, Amo ng members of an HMO, the introduction of a small copayment for the us e of the emergency department was associated with a decline of about 1 5 percent in the use of that department, mostly among patients with co nditions considered likely not to present an emergency. (C)1996, Massa chusetts Medical Society.