INTRAOPERATIVE VESICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AS A GUIDE IN THE CLOSURE OF ABDOMINAL-WALL DEFECTS

Citation
A. Rizzo et al., INTRAOPERATIVE VESICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AS A GUIDE IN THE CLOSURE OF ABDOMINAL-WALL DEFECTS, The American surgeon, 62(3), 1996, pp. 192-196
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00031348
Volume
62
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
192 - 196
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1348(1996)62:3<192:IVPMAA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Increased intra-abdominal pressure represents a difficult problem when closing abdominal wall defects (AWD) and can cause renal insufficienc y and vascular injury to the intestine with the development of necroti zing enterocolitis. Urinary bladder pressure measurements have been sh own to accurately reflect intra-abdominal pressure in animal models. T his study compares outcomes with and without vesical pressure measurem ents in AWD. Since its description in 1987, these vesical pressure mea surements have guided the closure of AWDs. A pressure of <20 cm H2O al lows closure by primary fascial, skin, or staged prosthetic closure. A ll charts of patients who underwent AWD closure from 1981 to 1993 were reviewed and data collected including type of defect and closure, ges tational age, weight, age at operation, fluid requirements and urinary outputs, ventilator requirements, days to first and total feeding, to tal parenteral nutrition (TPN) days, hospital days, hospital charges, morbidity, and mortality. Results were analyzed by paired or unpaired Student's t test or Fisher's exact test. Twenty-seven infants did not receive vesical pressure measurements, whereas 13 did. No significant differences occurred in the parameters recorded in these two diverse g roups. When gastroschisis patients only were compared, a significant d ecrease in intravenous fluid requirements in the vesical measurement g roup occurred on postoperative Day 2 (155.3 +/- 37.5 versus 109.6 +/- 34.3; P = 0.016), and a significant decrease in urinary output occurre d on postoperative Day 3 (4.2 +/- 112 versus 3.1 +/- 1.1; P = 0.044). Ventilator support, TPN days, and oral feeding data were all lower in the vesical measurement group but did not reach statistical significan ce. Hospital days and hospital changes showed a trend to lower values in the measured group (P values 0.052 and 0.095, respectively). Intrao perative vesical pressure measurements represent a simple, safe, effec tive method to guide the closing of AWD and result in less capillary l eak and more prompt diuresis, and may result in significantly less mor bidity, mortality, and cost.