Hhj. Schmidt et al., QUANTIFICATION OF LIPOPROTEIN(A) - COMPARISON OF AN AUTOMATED LATEX-ENHANCED NEPHELOMETRIC ASSAY WITH AN IMMUNOENZYMOMETRIC METHOD, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry, 34(2), 1996, pp. 119-124
Several studies indicate the relevance of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in th
e genesis of premature coronary artery disease. A simple method for de
termining the concentration of Lp(a) is therefore of great interest fo
r assessing the risk of coronary artery disease in patients. We compar
ed a new latex-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (Behringwerke AG, Ma
rburg, Germany), using the Behring Nephelometer System 100, with an es
tablished immunoenzymometric assay (Immune, Heidelberg, Germany). A to
tal of 163 patients was studied. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients o
f variation were between 2.2% and 7.1%, and between 3.4% and 8.6%, dep
ending on the concentration of Lp(a). The correlation between the stud
ied assays was excellent (r = 0.93, y = 0.98x -1.57, Spearman rank, Pa
ssing & Bablok). When values above 1000 mg/l for Lp(a) were excluded,
the correlation was even higher. Increased light scattering with parti
cle size, which hitherto has been a disadvantage of the nephelometric
technique, seems to be negligible using the improved latex-enhanced ap
proach. In patients with triacylglycerol values above 4.5 mmol/1 (n =
19) there was no interference with the Behring system, i. e. the resul
ts of the nephelometric method were not increasing, and they agreed wi
th those of the immunoenzymometric assay. In conclusion, this new late
x-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay represents a rapid and precise me
thod for the quantification of Lp(a).