R. Hachamovitch et al., EXERCISE MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SPECT IN PATIENTS WITHOUT KNOWN CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE - INCREMENTAL PROGNOSTIC VALUE AND USE IN RISK STRATIFICATION, Circulation, 93(5), 1996, pp. 905-914
Background We evaluated the incremental prognostic value, the role in
risk stratification, and the impact on patient management of myocardia
l perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in a po
pulation of patients without prior myocardial infarction, catheterizat
ion, or revascularization. Methods and Results We examined 2200 consec
utive patients who at the time of their dual-isotope SPECT had not und
ergone catheterization, coronary artery bypass surgery, or percutaneou
s transluminal coronary angioplasty and had no known history of previo
us myocardial infarction. Follow-up was performed at a mean of 566+/-1
42 days (97% complete) for hard events (cardiac death and myocardial i
nfarction) and for referral to cardiac catheterization or revasculariz
ation within 60 days after nuclear testing. Examination of clinical, e
xercise, and nuclear models by use of pre-exercise tolerance test (ETT
), post-ETT, and nuclear information using a stepwise Cox proportional
hazards model and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis re
vealed that nuclear testing added incremental prognostic value after i
nclusion of the most predictive clinical and exercise variables (globa
l chi(2)=12 for clinical variables; 31 for clinical + exercise variabl
es; 169 for nuclear variables; gain in chi(2), P<.0001 for all; receiv
er-operating characteristic areas: 0.66+/-0.04 for clinical, 0.73+/-0.
04 for clinical + exercise variables, 0.87+/-0.03 for nuclear variable
s, P=.03 for gain in area with exercise variables; P<.001 for increase
with nuclear variables). Multiple logistic regression analysis reveal
ed that scan information contributed 95% of the information regarding
referral to catheterization with further additional information provid
ed by presenting symptoms and exercise-induced ischemia. Referral rate
s to early catheterization and revascularization paralleled the hard e
vent rates in all scan categories-very low referral rates in patients
with normal scans and significant increases in referral rates as a fun
ction of worsening scan results. Even after stratification by clinical
and exercise variables such as the Duke treadmill score, pre- and pos
t-ETT likelihood of coronary artery disease, presenting symptoms, sex,
and age, the nuclear scan results further risk-stratified the patient
subgroups, thus demonstrating clinical incremental value. Conclusions
In a patient population with no evidence of previous coronary artery
disease at overall low risk (1.8% hard event rate), myocardial perfusi
on SPECT adds incremental prognostic information and risk-stratifies p
atients even after clinical and exercise information is known. It appe
ars that referring physicians use this test in an appropriate manner i
n selecting patients to be referred to catheterization or revasculariz
ation.