Negative-expected-value (NEV) suits are ones in which the expected lit
igation costs exceed the expected judgment. This article offers a new
theory for the credibility and success of plaintiffs with NEV suits. T
he theory is based on recognizing that litigation costs are generally
not incurred all at once but rather over time; this divisibility of th
e litigation process is shown to play a crucial strategic role. The an
alysis identifies the conditions under which a plaintiff with an NEV s
uit will have a credible threat and succeed in extracting a settlement
. it is demonstrated that plaintiffs have credible threats in a much w
ider set of cases-including in numerous small-stakes cases-than has be
en suggested by prior economic analysis of the subject.