The liability provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) have added a new twist to the
concept of ''buyer beware'' in commercial real estate transactions. T
he Phase I Environmental Assessment was developed partly to provide a
defense against that liability. Recent attempts to improve that defens
e by standardizing the approach to Phase I assessments may, in some ca
ses, be counter-productive. This standardization has occurred at a tim
e when the assessment market has created a surfeit of assessors, often
with little practical training or experience. Some of these assessors
have used the standards to develop a formulaic approach to assessment
s, despite the fact that many sites warrant different approaches due t
o differences in site characteristics and data quality. Every research
step of the Phase I process-environmental and historical records revi
ew, site reconnaissance, and interviews-has potential problems that de
fy standardization. These problems must be properly understood to ensu
re the adequacy of a site assessment.