This paper explores therapists' perceptions of their assessment and tr
eatment of new immigrant families from two very distinct populations:
the former Soviet Union and Ethiopia. Some 145 professionals, approxim
ately 70 per cent of those who treat new immigrants in the northern pa
rt of Israel, were questioned about various aspects of their assessmen
t and treatment process. The differences between therapists and client
families regarding the client's similarity to or difference from the
majority culture are discussed. Of particular concern is whether thera
pists favour personal rather than contextual formulations of client pr
oblems. The results indicate that the wider the gap between the cultur
al background of the therapist and the immigrant families, the more se
nsitive and contextual the therapist's assessment and intervention cho
ices.