The results of an analysis of the performance and cost impacts for red
uction of the major greenhouse gas emission, CO2 from the Humid Air Tu
rbine (HAT) cycle as compared to an advanced steam cooled combined cyc
le are presented. The flow rate of the cooled exhaust gas from the HAT
cycle to be treated in the CO2 recovery unit is significantly lower w
hile the CO2 concentration of this feed gas is higher than that in a c
ombined cycle which reduces both the operating and the capital costs o
f the CO2 recovery unit. The water recovered from the exhaust of the H
AT cycle is recycled, thus greatly reducing the water consumption of t
he power plant. The cycle with its inherently high thermal efficiency
and low NOx emissions also ''attacks the problem at the source'' with
regard to the total greenhouse gas emissions. A capital cost saving of
approximately $50/KW is achieved with the FT4000 HAT as compared to t
he combined cycle when CO2 recovery is incorporated, despite the large
r advanced combined cycle plant benefiting from economies of scale.