M. Skelly et al., IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF P110(RB) EXPRESSION IN HUMAN-CELLS AND TISSUES - A REAPPRAISAL AND CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE, Applied immunohistochemistry, 4(1), 1996, pp. 16-24
We tested a variety of techniques to optimize the immunolocalization o
f p110(RB) in deparaffinized formalin- and methacarn-fixed tissue, inc
luding the use of heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using a microw
ave oven and DNase as pretreatments. By testing a number of commercial
ly available antibodies and employing a series of different buffers at
different pHs, as well as varying microwave exposure times, we obtain
ed optimal nuclear immunostaining comparable to that observed in snap-
frozen tissue sections and cell blocks. Employing very low pH buffers
(pH 1.6) resulted in the highest signal-to-noise ratio, but also resul
ted in nonspecific nuclear immunostaining that could be duplicated wit
h monoclonal antibodies to cell-surface antigens (e.g., CD20) using si
milar conditions. Even in optimally preserved tissues using optimal im
munostaining techniques, a range of p110(RB) immunostaining patterns w
as noted in normal tissues, including a subset of cells in which p110(
RB) was not reliably detectable. We conclude that whereas HIER techniq
ues can permit the immunolocalization of p110(RB) in deparaffinized se
ctions of human tissues and tumors, given the large variations in appa
rent p110(RB) immunostaining intensities, immunohistochemistry must be
used with great caution as a method of assessing alterations of retin
oblastoma (RE) protein function and should be used only in the context
of adequate internal controls and corroborative methods of assessment
of p110(RB) status.