EUSTASY AS A TEST OF A CRETACEOUS SUPERPLUME HYPOTHESIS

Citation
J. Hardebeck et Dl. Anderson, EUSTASY AS A TEST OF A CRETACEOUS SUPERPLUME HYPOTHESIS, Earth and planetary science letters, 137(1-4), 1996, pp. 101-108
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Geochemitry & Geophysics
ISSN journal
0012821X
Volume
137
Issue
1-4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
101 - 108
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-821X(1996)137:1-4<101:EAATOA>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The mantle plume model has been used to explain a variety of geologica l and geodynamic events. For instance, a large plume, or 'superplume', under the Pacific basin has been proposed to account for a number of Cretaceous events, such as a global sealevel rise, an increase in glob al average temperature, and a pause in the reversals of the Earth's ma gnetic field [1,2]. The primary evidence for this hypothesis is a mode l for the rate of production of ocean ridge material and ocean plateau s, with a high from about 120-80 Ma, mostly due to activity in the Pac ific basin, which is claimed to have been driven by the upwelling of a large plume from the core-mantle boundary. The hypothesis requires th at a large part of the primary evidence for this high productivity has disappeared by subduction. Here, we test this hypothesis by comparing the Cretaceous eustatic sealevel highstand which would result from th e superplume model with generally accepted values. Our model includes estimates of eustatic sealevel change resulting from phenomena explici tly specified for the proposed plume, such as the volume of ocean crus t produced and the extent of lithospheric swelling associated with the plume head, as well as other events known to affect eustatic sealevel , such as glaciation and continental collision. The estimated Cretaceo us highstand resulting from all the modeled effects is 220-470 m, comp ared to the observed value of 120-200 m. This discrepancy indicates a probable overestimate of the rate of seafloor and plateau creation and of the size of plume that could have existed. The breakup of the Pang ean supercontinent is a more viable explanation of the Cretaceous seal evel rise.