J. Hardebeck et Dl. Anderson, EUSTASY AS A TEST OF A CRETACEOUS SUPERPLUME HYPOTHESIS, Earth and planetary science letters, 137(1-4), 1996, pp. 101-108
The mantle plume model has been used to explain a variety of geologica
l and geodynamic events. For instance, a large plume, or 'superplume',
under the Pacific basin has been proposed to account for a number of
Cretaceous events, such as a global sealevel rise, an increase in glob
al average temperature, and a pause in the reversals of the Earth's ma
gnetic field [1,2]. The primary evidence for this hypothesis is a mode
l for the rate of production of ocean ridge material and ocean plateau
s, with a high from about 120-80 Ma, mostly due to activity in the Pac
ific basin, which is claimed to have been driven by the upwelling of a
large plume from the core-mantle boundary. The hypothesis requires th
at a large part of the primary evidence for this high productivity has
disappeared by subduction. Here, we test this hypothesis by comparing
the Cretaceous eustatic sealevel highstand which would result from th
e superplume model with generally accepted values. Our model includes
estimates of eustatic sealevel change resulting from phenomena explici
tly specified for the proposed plume, such as the volume of ocean crus
t produced and the extent of lithospheric swelling associated with the
plume head, as well as other events known to affect eustatic sealevel
, such as glaciation and continental collision. The estimated Cretaceo
us highstand resulting from all the modeled effects is 220-470 m, comp
ared to the observed value of 120-200 m. This discrepancy indicates a
probable overestimate of the rate of seafloor and plateau creation and
of the size of plume that could have existed. The breakup of the Pang
ean supercontinent is a more viable explanation of the Cretaceous seal
evel rise.