COMPARATIVE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC AND HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF SEVERAL AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC DRUGS IN ANESTHETIZED DOGS

Citation
P. Bruelle et al., COMPARATIVE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC AND HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF SEVERAL AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC DRUGS IN ANESTHETIZED DOGS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 82(3), 1996, pp. 648-656
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032999
Volume
82
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
648 - 656
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2999(1996)82:3<648:CEAHOS>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Large and equipotent doses of several local anesthetics were administe red in a cardiac electrophysiologic model on closed-chest dogs. Five g roups of pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were each given intravenously 16 mg/kg lidocaine, 12 mg/kg mepivacaine, 4 mg/kg or 8 mg/kg etidocai ne, and 4 mg/kg bupivacaine. Lidocaine induced bradycardia, slowing of atrioventricular node conduction (AH), and marked hemodynamic depress ion, represented by a decrease in mean aortic pressure (MAoP), in the peak of first derivative of left ventricular pressure (LVdP/dt(max)) a nd by an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Atrial pacing at pacing cycle length (PCL) of 298 ms did not enhance t he alteration of variables of ventricular conduction (His ventricle [H V] interval and QRS duration). Mepivacaine induced slight alteration o f electrophysiologic variables. Atrial pacing at PCL of 312 ms did not enhance the alteration of HV and QRS duration. Mepivacaine induced tr ansient hemodynamic depression. Etidocaine (4 mg/kg) induced electroph ysiologic and hemodynamic alterations similar to mepivacaine but artri al pacing at PCL of 330 ms enhanced HV lengthening and QRS widening (P < 0.05). Etidocaine (8 mg/kg) induced marked impairment of PR, HV, QR S, and QT(c) and dramatic hemodynamic depression represented by a decr ease in MAoP from 123.5 +/- 16.2 at baseline to 36.5 +/- 8.3 mm Hg at 1 min (P < 0.001) and of LVdP/dt(max) from 1446 +/- 379 to 333 +/- 93 mm Hg/s (P < 0.001). Bupivacaine induced dramatic impairment of electr ophysiologic variables. Bupivacaine also decreased LVdP/dt(max) (from 1333 +/- 347 to 617 +/- 299, P < 0.001) and increased LVEDP. We conclu de that mepivacaine induced moderate cardiotoxicity. In contrast, lido caine induced dramatic hemodynamic depression while etidocaine and bup ivacaine markedly impaired both electrophysiologic and hemodynamic var iables. This double impairment could explain the great difficulty in r esuscitating patients who have had cardiotoxic accidents induced by et idocaine or bupivacaine.