Purpose: To assess the microleakage of Class V preparations restored w
ith three bonding agents using wet and dry bonding. Materials and Meth
ods: Cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of extr
acted human premolar teeth and restored with resin composite after app
lication of the dentin bonding agents, using a wet or dry bonding tech
nique. The teeth were stored for 2 weeks at 37 degrees C, thermocycled
, and the restorations examined for leakage using buffered methylene b
lue as the marker. The teeth were sectioned bucco-lingually through th
e restorations and the degree of microleakage assessed microscopically
. Results: All groups showed leakage at both the dentin and enamel mar
gins. There was no significant difference in leakage at the enamel mar
gins between groups (P>0.05) and no significant differences in leakage
between the wet bonding (P>0.05) or dry bonding (P>0.05) procedures.
However, when comparing the effects of wet and dry bonding, there was
less leakage at the gingival margin in the groups where the bonding ag
ent was acetone-based and wet bonding was used (P<0.03). There was no
significant difference in leakage for Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus wh
en either maleic acid or phosphoric acid was used as the etchant (P>0.
05).