Hr. Burstin et al., DO THE POOR SUE MORE - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF MALPRACTICE CLAIMS ANDSOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 270(14), 1993, pp. 1697-1701
Objective.-To evaluate whether socioeconomic status is associated with
risk of malpractice claims, particularly among those who have suffere
d medical injury. Design.-Case-control study. Setting.-Fifty-one hospi
tals in New York State. Methods.-The presence and severity of medical
injury, defined as disability at the time of discharge or prolongation
of the hospitalization caused by medical treatment as opposed to the
disease process, were assessed through review of approximately 31 000
hospital records in New York in 1984. These sampled records were then
linked to formal malpractice claims. To estimate the risk of malpracti
ce claims by age, gender, race, insurance status, and income, we condu
cted a case-control study of claimant cases matched with nonclaimant c
ontrols. The cases were all those patients who filed malpractice claim
s referring to alleged malpractice during a sampled hospitalization. P
hysician reviewers had previously judged the level of disability that
resulted from the medical injury. Claimants (n=51) were each matched w
ith five nonclaimant controls on the basis of injury. Noninjured cases
were matched with noninjured controls and injured cases were matched
with injured controls. Results.-We found that poor patients (odds rati
o [OR], 0.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.8) and uninsured
patients (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.005 to 0.9) were significantly less likel
y to file malpractice claims, after controlling for the severity of me
dical injury. Among patients who suffered medical injury, the elderly
(OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.03. to 0.9) were also less likely to file claims.
Gender and race were not independently associated with risk of malprac
tice claims. Conclusions.-Poor and uninsured patients are significantl
y less likely to sue for malpractice, even after controlling for the p
resence of medical injury. Fear of malpractice risk should not be a si
gnificant factor in the decision to serve the poor. Tort reforms that
would protect physicians who serve the medically indigent from malprac
tice suits may not be warranted.