FORMATION AND DIFFERENTIAL REMOVAL OF C-8 AND N-2-GUANINE ADDUCTS OF THE FOOD CARCINOGEN 2-AMINO-3-METHYLIMIDAZO [4,5-F]QUINOLINE IN THE LIVER, KIDNEY, AND COLORECTUM OF THE RAT
Rj. Turesky et al., FORMATION AND DIFFERENTIAL REMOVAL OF C-8 AND N-2-GUANINE ADDUCTS OF THE FOOD CARCINOGEN 2-AMINO-3-METHYLIMIDAZO [4,5-F]QUINOLINE IN THE LIVER, KIDNEY, AND COLORECTUM OF THE RAT, Chemical research in toxicology, 9(2), 1996, pp. 397-402
Chronic feeding of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) in the
diet results in tumor formation of the liver and colorectum, but does
not induce tumorigenesis in the kidney of male Fischer-344 rats. The
formation and rate of removal of DNA adducts were investigated in rats
given an oral dose of IQ (20 mg/kg) to determine if adduct persistenc
e affects the tissue susceptibility to IQ-induced tumorigenesis. Analy
sis of DNA adducts by P-32-postlabeling showed the formation of two 2'
-deoxyguanosine (dG) adducts, osin-8-yl)-2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f
]quinoline (dG-C8-IQ) and anosin-N-2-yl)-amino-3-methylidazo[4,5-f]qui
noline (dG-N-2-IQ). The pattern and distribution of these dG adducts w
ere similar in all tissues; dG-C8-IQ and dG-N-2-IQ accounted for appro
ximately 70% and 15-20%, respectively, of the observed radioactivity.
Maximal DNA binding was observed in liver (7.64 +/- 1.08 adducts per 1
0(7) bases) and in colorectum (1.08 +/- 0.22 adducts per 10(7) bases)
24 h following IQ treatment, while optimal binding appeared in kidney
(2.41 +/- 0.47 adducts per 10(7) bases) 72 h after treatment. Greater
than 50% of the dG-C8-IQ adduct was removed from DNA of liver and kidn
ey within 1 week of treatment, In contrast, the dG-N-2-IQ adduct persi
sted and was the principal lesion remaining in liver and kidney 4 week
s after treatment with IQ, There was no evidence for selective removal
of either adduct in the colorectum over a 3 week period, and adduct r
emoval appeared to be attributed to cell turnover and not due to excis
ion repair processes. Therefore, the relative persistence of dG-C8-IQ
and dG-N-2-IQ adducts does not appear to explain tissue susceptibility
to IQ-induced neoplasia. The slow disappearance of IQ-DNA adducts sug
gests that adducts may accumulate during chronic exposure to IQ. Furth
er investigations on DNA adduct formation and removal in animals chron
ically exposed to this carcinogen may help to explain the susceptibili
ty of various organs to IQ-induced tumorigenesis.