Separate bodies of research suggest that performance in spatial reason
ing covaries with gender and with gender role. Typically studies emplo
y a spatial task whose variance is then used to account for difference
s in scores between gender groups or variance in a measure of gender r
ole. A methodological issue in such research is that the tasks used to
represent spatial reasoning may be differentially available or differ
entially appealing as a function of gender. Also, authors tend to anal
yze data in terms of either gender or gender role but rarely both. A c
ollection of personality assessments administered to 204 college stude
nts each contained a completed Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inven
tory (MMPI-2) and a drawing of a human figure. Within MMPI-2 are three
measures of gender role. Drawing talent is unquestionably spatial and
has the advantage of being equally available and encouraged among the
two genders. Male gender predicted drawing skill. Within both genders
, self-perceived masculinity in gender role also predicted higher scor
es on the drawing skill. Outcomes are seen as compatible with Geschwin
d and Galaburda's 1987 formulation regarding the behavioral manifestat
ions of fetal androgenization.