HEEDING THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE WARNING LABEL DURING PREGNANCY - MULTIPARAE VERSUS NULLIPARAE

Objective: We compared the impact of the Federal Alcoholic Beverage Wa rning Label on multiparae (women with at least one previous live birth ) and nulliparae (women with no previous live births). The label, impl emented on November 18, 1989. urges women not to drink during pregnanc y because of the risk of birth defects. If multiparae drank during pri or pregnancies, delivering apparently normal babies, we hypothesized t hat the warning might be less salient for them. Method: We studied 17, 456 inner city black gravidas seen between September 1986 and Septembe r 1993 at one antenatal clinic. Time series analysis (ARIMA) examined trends in monthly means of antenatal drinking scores (alcohol consumpt ion adjusted for weeks' gestation, age. parity and periconceptional dr inking). Results: For nulliparae (n = 7,349), reported drinking began to show a significant decline in June 1990, 7 months after the impleme ntation of the warning label (t = 2.00, p < .04). In contrast, multipa rae (n = 10,107) showed no change in reported drinking (t = 1.23) post label. Conclusions: Given previous results that multiparae drink more and that heavier drinkers are ignoring the warning label, these data a re very distressing and suggest the importance of targeting multiparae for intensive prevention efforts.