H. Lahtinen et al., FAILURE OF CARBAMAZEPINE TO PREVENT BEHAVIORAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL SEQUELS OF EXPERIMENTALLY-INDUCED STATUS EPILEPTICUS, European journal of pharmacology, 297(3), 1996, pp. 213-218
Sustained electrical stimulation of the perforant pathway was used to
induce long-lasting hippocampal seizures in conscious rats. One hour p
rior to stimulation, rats were given i.p. injections of either saline
or a commonly used antiepileptic drug, carbamazepine (5H-dibenz[b,f]az
epine-5-carboxamide; CBZ; 20 mg/kg). When tested 2 weeks later in a wa
ter maze, both the saline- and the carbamazepine-pretreated rats showe
d similarly a severe impairment in spatial learning compared to non-st
imulated controls. Histological evaluation revealed that the pyramidal
cell damage was (P < 0.05) milder in the carbamazepine-pretreated gro
up in the CA1, bur not the CA3c subfield, However, the number of somat
ostatin-immunoreactive neurons in both stimulated groups was reduced e
qually. Thus, at the dose of 20 mg/kg, which is a usual anticonvulsive
dose in humans, carbamazepine seems to offer only partial protection
against pyramidal cell damage, but no protection against the hilar som
atostatin-immunoreactive neuron loss or the spatial learning deficit a
fter perforant pathway stimulation in rats. The result clearly differs
from that obtained either with a GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid)-enhan
cing drug and a novel antiepileptic, vigabatrin (4-amino-hex-5-enoic a
cid) or with a competitive NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor ant ag
onist, CGP 39551 (DL-[E]-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentenenoic ac
id carboxyethylester) in the same test situation.