Ja. Paice et al., INTRASPINAL MORPHINE FOR CHRONIC PAIN - A RETROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER STUDY, Journal of pain and symptom management, 11(2), 1996, pp. 71-80
Intraspinal opioids are frequently used in the treatment of cancer and
noncancer pain, but few studies have evaluated the efficacy of this t
echnique. This multicenter, retrospective study surveyed physicians in
the United States regarding their standard practices when using intra
spinal opioids delivered via an implanted drug administration device.
Thirty-five physicians (50.0%) responded, providing 429 usable patient
forms (52.4%), which sought information about screening, outcomes, do
sing, and adverse effects. Patients with malignant (32.7%) and noncanc
er (67.3%) pain had been treated for an average of 14.6 +/- 0.57 month
s (range, 8-94 months) at the time of form completion. For all patient
s, the mean percent relief was 61.0% +/- 1.35%. Patients with somatic
pain tended to have greater relief as measured by a global rating of p
ain relief than did patients with other types of pain (Mann-Whitney te
st, P = 0.0003). After titration during the first 3 months, intratheca
l morphine doses increased only twofold from 6.84 +/- 0.65 mg/day at 3
months to 13.19 +/- 1.76 mg/day at 24 months. Compared to those with
noncancer pain, malignant pain patients had a higher average initial d
ose. The average dose used by cancer patients escalated quickly and th
en stabilized, whereas the average doses used by noncancer pain patien
ts exhibited a more gradual, linear increase in dose. Long-term advers
e drug effects wee uncommon, but system malfunction, usually catheter
related, occurred in 21.6% of patients. Prospective, randomized, contr
olled clinical studies of long-term efficacy and adverse effects are w
arranted.