Lk. Chambers et al., SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY IN WILD POPULATIONS OF HOUSE MICE (MUS-DOMESTICUS) ON THE DARLING-DOWNS, SOUTH-EASTERN QUEENSLAND, Wildlife research, 23(1), 1996, pp. 23-38
This study examined habitat use by house mice (Mus domesticus) in an a
gricultural landscape during a phase of population increase. The prima
ry aim was to determine whether spatial heterogeneity is an important
consideration when examining population processes of mice. Mice within
a 4-km(2) trapping zone were trapped on approximately 36 transects at
each of six farms on the Darling Downs, Queensland, in May and June 1
992. There were 2100 trap-nights at each farm. Most mice were caught i
n undisturbed grass Verges along fencelines. Undisturbed verges also h
arboured mice of above-average body condition and had the highest prop
ortion of adult females breeding. High numbers of mice were caught als
o in roadside verges, long sorghum stubble and ripe summer crops. Few
mice were caught in fellow paddocks, short sorghum stubble and ploughe
d sorghum stubble. Habitat use did not vary with sex or age-class. The
distribution of mice amongst habitats varied at each farm. Thus, over
the two months there were farm-level differences in how mice used the
landscape in this agricultural system. These variations in habitat us
e by mice were significant at both a fine scale of habitat classificat
ion (seven habitat types) and a broader scale (four habitat types) mor
e generally applicable to grain-growing regions in Australia. This stu
dy demonstrates that spatial heterogeneity needs to be considered when
designing trapping protocols or control strategies for mice.