This study focusses on the relationships among gender, power, and sexu
ality. It examines how discursive positioning affects the negotiation
by women of practices of safer sex in terms of the AIDS epidemic. Two
audio-taped women-only group discussions were analysed using Hollway's
(1984, 1989) interpretative discourse analysis. In the accounts, disc
ourses of stigma which constitute the person with AIDS as ''Other'' te
nded to vitiate co-responsibility between men and women for safer sex,
men apparently reacting defensively to attempts by women to negotiate
safer sex. Then, the greater intimacy of non-intromission techniques
than penetrative genital sex may also problematise these as safer sex
practices. Although some women draw on discourses of control and asser
tiveness in approaching sexuality-and these may offer potential for ne
gotiating safer sex-it is suggested that until heterosexual men acknow
ledge AIDS as a real risk, and begin to take emotional responsibility
in relationships, implementation of safer sex practices in heterosexua
l sex will be hindered.