From the distinctions between ''ontology'' and ''logic'' and between '
'formal'' and ''material'' we obtain two basic oppositions. Keeping th
e term ''ontology'' constant yields the opposition between ''formal on
tology'' and ''material ontology''. This raises a question: when one s
peaks of ontology, how can its formal aspects be distinguished from it
s material ones? If, instead, we keep the term ''formal'' constant, th
e opposition is between ''formal ontology'' and ''formal logic''. The
question here is therefore: when we talk about ''formal'' how can we d
istinguish between logic and ontology? Starting from these questions,
I propose to update the somewhat old distinction between formal ontolo
gy as the domain of the distributive-collective opposition and materia
l ontology as the domain of the parts-whole oppositions. (C) 1995 Acad
emic Press Limited