A COMPARISON OF RISK ASSESSMENT OF SINGLE AND COMBINATION MANUAL HANDLING TASKS .1. MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE WEIGHT MEASURES

Many manual handling activities involve combinations of pull, lift, ca rry, lower and push, yet few studies have investigated how to assess t he risk of such combination tasks. Most recommendations assume that a combination task can be split into its components for assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the risks assessed in single manual h andling tasks with those in combination tasks. Nine male and nine fema le students participated in a study to determine Maximum Acceptable We ights (MAWs) in single and combination tasks at different frequencies (1 min(-1) and 3 min(-1) for combination tasks and 3 min(-1) and 6 min (-1) for single tasks) and heights (floor, knuckle, shoulder). Combina tion tasks consisted of one each of the single tasks (pull, lift, carr y, lower and push). The MAW of each combination task was compared to t he MAWs of the single tasks of which it was composed using repeated me asures analysis of variance with specified contrasts. In at least one of the 12 comparisons each single task MAW was found to be different f rom its related combination task MAW. It was concluded that the curren t use of single task MAWs to estimate the risk in combination tasks wa s unacceptable. Prediction models for combination task MAWs based on s ingle tasks MAWs were also developed, using step-wise regression. Alth ough coefficients of determination of around 0.8 were achieved it was argued that owing to their situation-specific nature the prediction of combination task risk using single task MAWs was likely to result in unacceptable risk errors.