COMPARISON OF TOPICAL ANESTHETICS WITHOUT COCAINE TO TETRACAINE-ADRENALINE-COCAINE AND LIDOCAINE INFILTRATION DURING REPAIR OF LACERATIONS - BUPIVACAINE-NOREPINEPHRINE IS AN EFFECTIVE NEW TOPICAL ANESTHETIC AGENT
Ga. Smith et al., COMPARISON OF TOPICAL ANESTHETICS WITHOUT COCAINE TO TETRACAINE-ADRENALINE-COCAINE AND LIDOCAINE INFILTRATION DURING REPAIR OF LACERATIONS - BUPIVACAINE-NOREPINEPHRINE IS AN EFFECTIVE NEW TOPICAL ANESTHETIC AGENT, Pediatrics, 97(3), 1996, pp. 301-307
Objective. To compare the effectiveness of four topical anesthetics th
at do not contain cocaine with that of topical tetracaine-adrenaline-c
ocaine (TAG) and lidocaine infiltration during laceration repair in ch
ildren. Design. This was a randomized, blinded trial. Setting. The stu
dy was conducted in the emergency department of a large children's hos
pital. Participants. Subjects were children 2 years of age or older wi
th a laceration 5 cm or less in length that required suturing. Interve
ntions. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four noncoca
ine-containing topical anesthetics, topical TAG, or lidocaine infiltra
tion anesthesia before laceration repair. Outcome Measures. Outcome me
asures assessed pain perceptions using a Visual Analogue Scale, Likert
scale, and Anesthetic Effectiveness scale. Distress behaviors of pati
ents were measured with the Restrained Infants and Children Distress R
ating Scale. Results. Two hundred forty patients were enrolled in the
study. Using alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.2, there was statistical power
to detect differences of 0.3 to 1.3 U for the outcome measures used. T
he bupivacaine-norepinephrine topical solution (Bupivanor) performed b
etter than the other three new topical preparations. It provided effec
tive wound anesthesia during laceration repair, especially for lacerat
ions of the face and scalp, where it was consistently rated as effecti
ve as TAC and 1% lidocaine infiltration by all observer groups for all
outcome measures. There was a 4% overall wound complication rate, inc
luding one wound infection. Conclusion. Bupivanor is an effective alte
rnative to TAC and lidocaine infiltration for local anesthesia during
laceration repair, especially on the face and scalp. The effectiveness
of Bupivanor on the face is important, because it is here where TAC i
s most likely inadvertently to come into contact with mucous membranes
and result in Systemic toxicity. Because pain and distress stores did
not take into consideration the pain associated with the initial inje
ction of lidocaine, the findings of this study conservatively estimate
Bupivanor's effectiveness compared with lidocaine infiltration.