We construct a formal model, based upon the rules and structure of the
Russian Congress of People's Deputies, to characterize equilibrium st
rategies pursued by an agenda-setting Speaker. In conjunction with inf
ormation about the distribution of preferences in the RCPD, our Czar R
ule model yields several testable hypotheses. The model receives some
empirical backing, but overall the results of our analyses do not supp
ort it. We therefore attribute the conflict between the Yeltsin govern
ment and the RCPD to fundamental disagreements over policy and not to
internal contradictions in constitutional design.