The announced purpose of Alan Hunt and Gary Wickham's book; Foucault a
nd Law, is ''to demonstrate the pertinence of [Michel] Foucault for co
ntemporary issues in legal studies,'' In this review essay, Hugh Baxte
r acknowledges the important contributions Hunt and Wickham have made,
both in introducing basic Foucaultian concepts to a legal academic au
dience, and in identifying the defects in Foucault's explicit discussi
ons of law. Yet, Baxter contends, the authors turn too quickly from Fo
ucault's work toward their own new research project the ''sociology of
law as governance.'' Rather than constructing a new subdiscipline of
the sociology of law, Baxter argues, the authors might have considered
more directly how Foucault's work could illuminate issues in contempo
rary legal studies. Through a critical examination of some exemplary a
ppropriations of Foulcault, Baxter suggests the possibilities and limi
ts of Foucault's usefulness for legal scholarship.