PHYSIOLOGICAL DEFINITIONS OF OBLITERATIVE BRONCHIOLITIS IN HEART-LUNGAND DOUBLE-LUNG TRANSPLANTATION - A COMPARISON OF THE FORCED EXPIRATORY FLOW BETWEEN 25-PERCENT AND 75-PERCENT OF THE FORCED VITAL CAPACITYAND FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME IN ONE SECOND
Gm. Patterson et al., PHYSIOLOGICAL DEFINITIONS OF OBLITERATIVE BRONCHIOLITIS IN HEART-LUNGAND DOUBLE-LUNG TRANSPLANTATION - A COMPARISON OF THE FORCED EXPIRATORY FLOW BETWEEN 25-PERCENT AND 75-PERCENT OF THE FORCED VITAL CAPACITYAND FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME IN ONE SECOND, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation, 15(2), 1996, pp. 175-181
Background and methods: A comparison of the forced expiratory flow bet
ween 25% and 75% of the forced vital capacity (FEF(25-75)) and forced
expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was conducted for the detection
of obstructive airway disease as an early manifestation of obliterati
ve bronchiolitis. Pulmonary function tests performed on heart-lung and
double lung transplant recipients between March 1981 and March 1993 w
ere reviewed. Thirty patients were identified who showed progressive d
eterioration in pulmonary function after transplantation. Ratios deter
mining proportionate decreases were calculated from measurements of ab
solute values for the FEF(25-75) and FEV(1) at the point when the FEF(
25-75) reached < 70% and less than or equal to 30% of predicted, divid
ed by baseline values obtained before the decline in function. Similar
ratios were obtained for FEV(1) and FEF(25-75) at the point the FEV(1
) declined greater than or equal to 20% from its baseline value. Resul
ts: Comparison of the ratios for the FEF(25-75) and FEV(1) at FEF(25-7
5) values < 70% and less than or equal to 30% of predicted and a simil
ar comparison when the FEV(1) declined greater than or equal to 20% fr
om baseline showed a greater proportional decrease in FEF(25-75) than
FEV(1) (p < 0.01). With the use of the FEF(25-75), declines in airway
function were detected earlier. After transplantation a decline in FEF
(25-75) to < 70% of predicted occurred approximately 112 days before a
20% decline in FEF1. Conclusion: The FEF(25-75) is more sensitive tha
n the FEV(1) for the early detection of obliterative bronchiolitis. A
presumptive diagnosis of obliterative bronchiolitis can be made with p
hysiologic criteria, providing infection or acute rejection has been r
uled out. When conducting epidemiologic studies or for vital statistic
s we propose that a decline in FEF(25-75) to < 70% be used to define t
he onset of obliterative bronchiolitis.