Hs. Huitfeldt et al., DIFFERENTIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MET AND EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTORIN NORMAL AND CARCINOGEN-TREATED RAT-LIVER, The Journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry, 44(3), 1996, pp. 227-233
Transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) and hepatocyte growth fac
tor (HGF) are strong hepatocyte mitogens and important regulators of L
iver regeneration, The TGF-alpha receptor EGFr appears primarily to me
diate a proliferative signal, whereas mitogenic, motogenic, and morpho
genic effects have been attributed to activation of the HGF receptor M
et, We have studied the localization of Met and EGFr in normal and car
cinogen-treated rat livers. Oval cells and preneoplastic lesions were
induced by diethylnitrosamine initiation, followed by promotion with 2
-acetylaminofluorene combined with a partial hepatectomy. Different li
ver cell populations and their receptor expression were characterized
by two-color immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy
, Hepatocytes were detected by keratin K8 staining, and oval cells and
bile ducts were recognized by keratin K19 expression, Enzyme-altered
preneoplastic lesions were identified by expression of placental gluta
thione S-transferase (GST-pi). Staining for these cellular markers was
combined with immunodetection of EGFr and Met, Normal liver exhibited
strong staining for EGFr in hepatocytes, whereas blood vessels, bile
ducts, and some sinusoidal cells were Met-positive, In carcinogen-trea
ted livers, oval cells showed Met but not EGFr immunostaining, GST-pi-
positive foci displayed EGFr immunostaining at a similar intensity as
surrounding hepatocytes, whereas Met was not detected, Our data indica
te that putative liver cells (oval cells) have a growth receptor pheno
type similar to that of bile ducts, whereas preneoplastic liver lesion
s appear hepatocyte-like, These results indicate that the preferential
proliferation of preneoplastic liver lesions compared to surrounding
hepatocytes is not associated with an altered EGFr or Met phenotype.